Pandemic of Fear

Book Review- A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth

May 2021

320 pages

A State of Fear | White Rose Book Cafe

Franklin D. Roosevelt famously said in his 1933 inaugural address that “we have nothing to fear but fear itself”. In the context of the Great Depression, he was referring to how fear can hamper efforts to solve situations and recover from difficult times.

In another context, it takes on a rather different and more sinister meaning- how fear itself can be weaponised against the population by totalitarian governments. In this landmark book Laura Dodsworth charts how the British government has been doing exactly this in the Covid-19 crisis, using fear of an unknown, invisible enemy- a virus- to coerce the public to accept previously unthinkable lockdowns and socially destructive distancing and quarantines, effectively dismantling the very fabric of society without firing a shot and relatively minimal police enforcement.

The book opens with Dodsworth’s personal reaction to “Fright Night”, when Johnson tells the country to lockdown, “inducing fear and evoking war and authoritarianism.” From that point on, she says,

the risk of death was energetically amplified, particularly during the 6pm and 10pm news broadcasts and on newspaper front pages. The Downing Street briefings were characterised by authority figures in suits on raised podiums and yellow and black chevroned signage warning danger, danger, danger.

Vast amounts of government resources and public money have been spent terrifying the public into “following the rules” through a combination of politically biased studies, dodgy statistics and a captive (or complicit) and censorious media scrupulously scrubbing any alternative points of view, no matter how well qualified. The captive and complicit media has been only to willing to sing to the government’s tune when, having closed so many other businesses, state propaganda has become their main source of advertising revenue.

The infamous Imperial College models– funded by Bill gates and the Chinese Communist Party- that predicted half a million deaths sans lockdown were based on flawed assumptions that took no account of pre-existing immunity- we have after all lived for millennia with coronaviruses. Nor did they consider the spontaneous changes in people’s behaviour on perceiving a real threat, or the already well-understood vast age stratification- older people are 1000x more times at risk of death than children. It was however sufficiently frightening to throw the entire population into an unprecedented lockdown. Similar tactics have been used repeatedly, as in the graph used by government advisor’s Whitty and Vallance to justify the second lockdown in October, showing a scary graph on TV predicting a completely implausible 4000 deaths a day. No scrutiny or cross-examination was permitted, just fear.

It is not surprising to most people that populations can be relatively easily scared, or that fear is used as a political tool, but this book gives us a rare behind-the-scenes look at the dark and sinister machinations of government propaganda through detailed research and a series of enlightening interviews, and introduces us to the extensive and highly developed governmental organisations that constitute what is essentially a modern-day Ministry of Truth.

Take the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) known as the “nudge unit” for example. With a global reach, through the BIT, “Britain is teaching governments around the world how to follow its model of nudging citizens into doing what is ‘best’ for them.”

Or the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) which infamously published in its report of March 22nd 2020 Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures :

A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened; it could be that they are reassured by the low death rate in their demographic group, although levels of concern may be rising … the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat.

The trappings of fear can be seen everywhere: Incident tape surrounding playgrounds and park benches, circles on the floor to keep social distance, ubiquitous masks serving as a constant reminder of a killer virus at large, the daily liturgy of death statistics on the media, posters of people on respirators in hospital asking you to “look into their eyes and tell them you followed the rules” or reminding you that “anyone can have it, anyone can spread it” have all played a role in terrorising the public into accepting the dismantling of society and the removal of basic freedoms that have been considered sacrosanct for centuries. Without these all-pervasive visible reminders that we live in constant danger from each other, fear of the virus would long since have rescinded.

No leader with the countries’ best interests at heart would act in this way. Rather, a responsible approach would be to reassure, give the basic facts in a balanced manner and let people do their own risk assessments, just as pandemic plans pre-March 2020 clearly advised.

Scared? Stay at home, wear a mask, self-isolate, whatever- but leave everyone else alone to get on with their lives. At no point was any of the government interventions necessary.

Dodsworth’s book contains some revealing interviews. One Whitehall insider expressed concern over the way behavioural psychology has taken over the country:

They told me that they are ‘stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology over the last five years’ and that ‘psychology and behavioural science are feted above everything else. The psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative. They have too much power and it intoxicates them.’

The psychology of fear, why it is so effective and so hard to break free from, are considered, along with the devastating impacts of a year and a half of state-sponsored fear-mongering. A substantial proportion of the population seem traumatised, and likely to continue mask-wearing and social distancing even after restrictions are lifted, if they ever are. Children especially badly effected, with record referrals to mental health services and increase in suicides. The NHS, far from being saved, now has a waiting list of over 12million, while the bill for Covid measures now exceeds 400 Billion pounds.

There is one point where I feel the author fails to complete joining the dots:

Fear was an open door – naturally, because we were in an epidemic. The government didn’t need to so much as knock on the door. It didn’t have to open it for us, and politely say, after you. It certainly didn’t need to use a battering ram.

This begs the question of whether there ever was a pandemic? In 2009 the WHO changed the definition of a pandemic to be any widely spreading infectious disease, regardless of mortality rates. The WHO themselves support Ioannidis’ assessment of an IFR of 0.2%, equivalent to seasonal influenza. Excess deaths in the UK are highest only since 2008. With an average age of death of 82, most with co-morbidities, the vast majority of the population have little to fear from Covid. The only conclusion is that the only pandemic we have experienced is one purely of fear.

This is an important contribution to the growing literature on the Great Hysteria, asking probing questions and revealing a great deal about how the government is working to brainwash the public. It should be on everyone’s reading list, and has already been selling very well. Hopefully it continue to do so and make a great impact, opening people’s eyes and maybe waking a few of them up. Buy a few copies for all your friends and relatives who might still have some functioning braincells, before it it too late.

Climate Change is the Next Covid

In an extraordinary sting operation earlier this month, Project Veritas obtained a clandestine recording of the CNN Technical Director admitting that, due to Covid fatigue, “our next thing is going to be climate change awareness“.

There’s a definitive ending to the pandemic. It’ll taper off to a point that it’s not a problem anymore….

I think there’s a COVID fatigue. So, like whenever a new story comes up, they’re [CNN’s] going to latch onto it. They’ve already announced in our office that once the public is — will be open to it — we’re going to start focusing mainly on climate.

It’s going to be our [CNN’s] focus. Like our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that’s what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be climate change awareness.

When asked what that would look like, he replied

I don’t know. I’m not sure. I have a feeling that it’s going to be like, constantly showing videos of decline in ice, and weather warming up, and like the effects it’s having on the economy–

[so that’s like the next] Pandemic-like story that we’ll beat to death, but that one’s got longevity. You know what I mean? Like there’s a definitive ending to the pandemic. It’ll taper off to a point that it’s not a problem anymore. Climate change can take years, so they’ll [CNN will] probably be able to milk that quite a bit

Charlie Chester, CNN technical Director

This blatant admission that the media can and does whip up panics and scares at will should come as no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to both climate and Covid scams, but is still remarkable to hear it from the horse’s mouth. Before Covid of course, the media’s principle obsession was Greta “How Dare You!” Thunberg and the promotion of eco-guilt.

Patrick Wood, who has written about the rise of technocracy and the long-standing goals of global elites to move to a one world government, has argued however that climate change on its own was not enough to push through their agenda. It was too abstract for more people, to far removed from daily concerns of making ends meet, and most of all, there were no dead bodies to point to. Covid-19 however was able to supply said dead bodies- in so far, that is, they died within 28 days of a positive PCR test.

A few fake Chinese videos of people collapsing in the streets, a redefinition of “pandemic” by the WHO to mean any widespread disease even with very low mortality, tight control of the media narrative to spread fear into the population, and a relatively mild respiratory virus was able to achieve overnight what had remained out of reach to climate change activists for decades.

Covid shares both the goals and much of the rhetoric of climate change: both are social engineering projects on a grand scale, intended to replace free market economies with centrally planned and controlled totalitarian states in which all individual rights and aspirations are subsumed to “the science”. Democracy is barely an afterthought and will have no place in such schemes. The public is to be frightened through the use of endless propaganda and government decrees into abandoning their sovereignty entirely in the service of Saving the Planet. No alternative can be broached, anyone who disagrees is a “denier”, and the ultimate goal is “zero Covid” / “zero carbon emissions.”

Despite countless billions already being spent on green follies like windfarms and endless rounds of treaties being formed at the highest international levels, the ultimate demands of the greens have always seemed insanely unrealistic if you actually bother to do the maths. There was a limit to how far societies would go to meeting carbon targets because soon they would run up against reality: the proposed “solutions” were not just far too costly but would actually mean the end of modern industrialised life and economies as we know it. Modern industry could never be powered by intermittent and diffuse wind- or solar-energy, and proposals to phase out fossil fuels- particularly since nuclear was generally also off the table- could only mean the end of economic growth and a drastic reduction of living standards, something which presumably the public would finally reject.

But Covid lockdowns changed all that and made the impossible possible. Suddenly, the planes stopped flying and the roads were empty. The WEF, in a tweet they later deleted, lauded lockdowns as “quietly improving cities around the world”. Far from being the catastrophic public health policy they clearly have been, lockdowns were seen as something to be welcomed, or at least to try to see the bright side of, as the environment at least might be a winner. “Climate change lockdowns” are being seriously proposed as being necessary every two years to cut carbon emissions. In unison, governments around the world urged this as an opportunity to “Build back Better”- revealing their true agenda of radical social transformation under the guise of public health and environmental policy.

If the links between climate and Covid were not so apparent, Boris Johnson’s address last November hailing the UK’s green New Deal would have come across as one of the most incongruous events of the past year, as well as being badly out of touch and insensitive to a nation under huge stress from the lockdowns. But seen in the broader agenda of the Great Reset- the latest phase of Agenda 21 which has been being implemented incrementally for years- it makes perfect sense.

The UK’s economy had been wrecked by months of business closures and furlough, but rather than some good news, or at least some indication of a constructive plan, the UK Prime Minister chose instead to wax lyrical about Britain’s Great Green Future with an ambitious 10-point plan for a “Green Industrial Revolution”.

Rather than providing some succour to the countless businesses destroyed and jobs lost from lockdowns, we were informed that vast resources would be ploughed into policies to address climate change, including the banning of all new diesel and petrol cars by 2030, a big push to switch to so-called “green energy” ie wind, a phasing our of gas-fired home heating, and an increase in cycle lanes.

Covid has thus facilitated a rapid ramping-up of green policies which have been becoming more prominent over the past 30 years. A report from Cambridge University in 2019, Absolute Zero, argues that all airports will have to close by 2050. In line with this, France has recently moved to ban all short-haul domestic flights to cut carbon emissions. How convenient then that in the name of Covid, the past year has seen a reversal of open borders in Europe and previously inconceivable restrictions on travel. There is zero likelihood of things ever returning to the way they were pre-March 2020 under these schemes. The next generation will not be waved off with their backpacks on a world trip with the blessing “The World is your oyster!”- it is more likely to be their prison if the globalists get their way.

The prevailing culture of Malthussianism

I used to be a Dark Green environmentalist, gloomily predicting eco-doom from over-population, resource depletion and climate apocalypse. Collapse seemed imminent and for a while I had a minor side-gig giving talks advising people to prepare for collapse by growing their own vegetables and organising local trading schemes.

Over time the irrationality and religious fanaticism of the green movement became impossible to ignore and I became increasingly at odds with the millenarian cultish aspects. Scratch beneath the surface and it becomes clear that far from being a touchy-feeling caring and progressive force focussed on living in harmony with nature, political environmentalism is a fully-fledged anti-human Malthusian cult, and by elevating the environment to the level of a god (or goddess) it necessarily denigrates humanity.

Moreover, environmentalism has its roots in the eugenics movement, and it is this that disturbingly segues into the cult of Covid-1984. The Great and the Good from David Attenborough to Prince Charles and Prince Philip have enthusiastically assumed roles as figureheads for this movement, scaring the world with omens of “10 years to save the planet” and referring to humans as being a cancer on the the face of the earth. “The real enemy is us”.

Prince Philip quote: If I were reincarnated I would wish ...

Both British PM Boris Johnson and his father Stanley Johnson– who wrote a number of books on the subject – were concerned about overpopulation, seeing it as an increasingly pressing issue. Both seem to see the solution as being in government programs rather than allowing the demographic transition to take its course. In contrast, most demographers accept that population is self-regulating over a couple of generations, as economic growth gives more freedom to women and large families tend to disappear with a move away from subsistence farming.

But mere population reduction falls short of the globalists’ agenda. Green Marxist policies will inexorably lead to general impoverishment and deprivation the current generations, still expecting progress and affluence, have no inkling of. Electric cars will be unaffordable but for the wealthy and their range and “smartness”- ie surveillance technology- will seriously limit how far they can take you. Energy of all kinds will be vastly more expensive and ultimately turned off altogether, all in the name of limiting carbon. As Dave Cullen suggests in this video covering many of the same points discussed here, Covid facemasks may in fact be really designed as a symbolic if not actual restriction on exhaling CO2. Thus humans are reduced to nothing more than bags of viral infection and sources of pollution.

Apart from the 0.01% global elite who will be free to fly around the globe on private jets wherever they wish, the future planned for those remaining after what I will euphemistically call population reduction – but which might be more accurately thought of as a cull or genocide- will be truly dystopian. Herded into crowded cities, fed with mealworms and “paid” only with a limited allowance of digital bytes, the rest of Nature will be able to gradually rewild as the Utopian Green Dream is realised and the world is finally purged of the cancer that is Humanity.

The scary part is that green brainwashing has gone so deep that these ideas are surprisingly popular even within much of the general population, which perhaps explains partly why lockdowns have met with such little resistance. Such is the decline of the west that people have come to hate themselves and each other and feel they deserve no better.

We are all Uyghurs now

The Chinese Communist Party’s Global Lockdown Fraud

Kate Wand’s film based on the letter

An important open letter has been sent by attorney Michael P. Senger, and co-signatories made up of scientists, lawyers and doctors to the FBI and other western intelligence agencies, alerting to them of the role the Chinese Communist Party played in perpetrating a “fraud of unprecedented scale”– the CCP Global Lockdown Lockdown Fraud.

This remarkable document calls for a federal investigation into “issues of a potential criminal nature” perpetrated by members of the Chinese government, the WHO and other scientists and political leaders around the world, concerning the Covid-19 pandemic.

Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire “science” of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion, deliberately promulgated by the Chinese Communist Party and its collaborators to impoverish the nations who implemented it.

Lockdowns have their origin in China, and Senger argues that they are the direct personal creation of the Chinese premier Xi Jinping, who experimented on the Uyghur population as a form of “re-education” before exporting them to the west in a bold move to drastically weaken our economies. In this fully referenced and detailed letter, extensive evidence is presented as to how this fraud was perpetrated, and by who.

Lockdowns have no science supporting their effectiveness, while the WHO and many other state health agencies had previously advised against blanket lockdowns prior to March 2020.

They have never been tried before. During the 1957 Asian flu pandemic- which killed between 1 and 4 million people worldwide, were rejected as an option because they don’t work and have unacceptable, catastrophic impacts on society.

there is no practical advantage in the closing of schools or the curtailment of public gatherings as it relates to the spread of this disease

Moreover, numerous studies published during the lockdowns of the past year have found them to be no more effective than other far less costly and damaging interventions such as basic hygiene and voluntary quarantining of the sick. A recent study found that harms caused by lockdowns outweighed any benefits tenfold.

China lied about its own lockdown of 11million people in Hubei province in February 2020, claiming it had successfully overcome the virus after six-weeks, using this brutal “non-pharmaceutical intervention” for the first time in history on this scale. The WHO, under the directorship of Tedros- himself potentially under investigation for crimes against humanity- lavished praise on China for its bold move and instructed the rest of the world to follow suit: “You must lockdown”. This was enacted upon indiscriminately without any regard to the differences between countries either of their economies, demographics or even incidence of Covid.

A key driver in this process of convincing the rest of the world to close its economies, schools and severely limit all social contact was the alarmist models from Imperial College, self-described as “China’s Best Academic Partner in the West”, already with a track-record of absurdly inflated and failed projections for deaths from swine flu, bird flu and foot-and-mouth disease. Their model predicted for example 2000 deaths a day by December in the UK, when the actual number never reached 400. Imperial college is heavily funded by China and considered so important that Xi Jinping himself visited in 2015. In a similar way, industry, state agencies and academia all over the world have been heavily infiltrated and have been effectively controlled by China for many years.

Everything thereafter necessary to scare the world into lockdown came from China- recommendations of use of mechanical ventilation, which were found to be lethal but increased the death rate; the fraudulent PCR-testing regimes universally used to produce a fake “casedemic” with high numbers of false positives; fake studies claiming to show asymptomatic transmission, previously almost unknown in similar viruses; and a systematic propaganda campaign including fake videos of people falling over in the street and armies of Twitter trolls accusing political leaders who were slow to impose restrictions of “genocide”.

The letter goes onto detail widespread corruption across the world, with scientific lockdown supporters, government advisors and senior health officials advocating lockdowns having demonstrably close ties to China. In each case, they have shown an extraordinary indifference to the devastating impact of lockdowns across societies where they have been implemented, and little interest in lifting the restrictions.

Commenting on the apparent compliance and credulity of the public in response to these ineffective, immoral, fraudulent and utterly self-destructive measures, the writers conclude:

Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support such devastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective — needlessly bankrupting millions of families and depriving millions of children of education and food — is, quite simply, too dark. Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative — that they might have been implemented without good cause — is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But those who know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worse for even less.

One of the co-signers, attorney Stacey Rudin has pointed out on Twitter that they are well aware the security agencies who are receiving the letter already know the about the contents; “we are just letting them know that we know.” Back in the summer, Michael Senger was already asking, why has there been so little interest in from the security community? Why have they not acted to stop this scam? The obvious answer is that they, like most of the world’s governments and agencies of all kinds are implicated and corrupted already, hardly surprising to many.

But we can only hope that this document, and Kate Wand’s accompanying film (above), are beginning to be picked up by the national press, and goes a long way to bring the evidence into the public eye, which might encourage more opposition to lockdowns at least put some pressure on authorities.

Facing the Great Reset in 2021

The first 10 days into the new year have already seen high drama. With the extraordinary events in Washington on January 6th leading to the Night of the Long Keystrokes as Twitter deleted the President’s account and began a purge of thousands of conservatives from their platforms, it feels like the globalists are showing their hand ever more clearly. This is a dangerous time with the democrats calling for impeachment for Trump supporters to be criminalised as terrorists. This will hardly lead to the unification of the country the incoming administration is promising. Instead, the US is looking increasingly like China with every passing day.

All democratic values have been under threat since last spring and now the pressure is being ramped up very rapidly. We are being lead by psychopaths with god-complexes who believe they have the right to determine the future of the whole of humanity who they wish to enslave permanently. That they have managed to fool most of the world’s population with a scam pandemic is only reinforcing their belief that they are vastly superior and we are just their play-things, rats in a cage for them to do with and experiment on as they please.

Many reading this will dismiss me as a conspiracy theorist, including many who know me well as a rational well balanced person who is not prone to making wild outlandish predictions. If this applies to you, I am unlikely to persuade you at this stage, but you may still like to read on for amusement. It will give me no satisfaction to be able to say “I told you so” further down the line, and by then it will be too late anyway. A surprisingly large proportion of the population seem so incapable of ever questioning authority they will never accept the truth even as they are being fed to the wolves.

The current restrictions we have been experiencing since March last year are nothing to with a virus, which is only a pretext to generate fear. Covid-19 did increase deaths in spring for a short while but we know that overall is that this virus is not much worse than a bad flu, and the response of unprecedented lockdowns, masks and social distancing is completely disproportionate. This is not about epidemiology, but control.

The lockdowns, previously unknown to science or the general public, are fake CCP “science” sold by China to a naive and panicked west to destroy our economies. According to Michael Senger and a team of scientists and health professionals in a letter just published to several western security agencies, lockdowns constitute a “fraud of unprecedented proportion.” By corrupting government agencies around the world, China has enacted a devastating blow against its rivals and is now close to global dominance.

Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support such devastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective — needlessly bankrupting millions of families and depriving millions of children of education and food — is, quite simply, too dark. Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative — that they might have been implemented without good cause — is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But those who know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worse for even less.

The global elites orchestrating the lockdowns have almost complete control of the media, which has been pumping out a continual diet of fear-porn for months, with all contrary voices and opinions censored and ignored. Recent events in the US, seeing the President barred from numerous social media platforms while real despots make death threats with impunity, show how dangerously this can escalate. Many people consume government propaganda through their TV for hours every day, whipping themselves into a frenzy of terror about an invisible enemy. Yet everything the mainstream media, which is then endlessly parroted on social media, is a lie.

Statistics on deaths, hospitalisations and infections are simply fabricated or mis-represented out of context with nothing to compare to. For most countries, the death rate is comparable to a bad flu season. Hospitals are regularly overburdened in the winter season, a fact that frequently makes the front pages, but only the intense focus of the media this year has created the impression that this is a unique situation requiring drastic action.

The basis of this fraud is the PCR test which can give a “positive” result for nearly anything, and is incapable of identifying infectiousness. Once the number of deaths declined in the summer- respiratory diseases are seasonal- the media switched to reporting “cases” usually expressed as a total number, not a percentage. Want more “cases”? Then do more tests! Simple. Hospitalisations and deaths the same- all inpatients are tested for Covid, and the hospitals have a financial incentive for maximising “Covid” patients, filling the wards with even mild cases, while if anyone happens to die of any cause- be it a heart attack or in some cases even an accident- they can be labelled a “Covid” death after a positive test, shown on scary graphs later on the evening news. The response will always be demands for stricter measures.

This misattribution muddies the waters when looking at the impact of Covid on total mortality; but even in the US which has seen one of the highest levels of excess deaths, up a a third of these may have been a result of the lockdown, which has disrupted health services, lead to old people dying of neglect, and an increase in suicides amongst younger age groups. Since this virus mainly attacks the old and co-morbid, differences between countries is mainly explained by how bad the flu was last year- where there was a lot of flu deaths, Covid has been rather mild; where there was a mild flu season, leaving more people susceptible this year, deaths will be higher. But as the virus moves through the population and herd immunity develops- young people are scarcely affected- the virus will inevitably mutate into strains which are more infectious, but less deadly. A virus does not want to kill you, just replicate and spread, and the best way for it to do this is through young healthy people who will have mild symptoms.

The correct response was to protect the vulnerable, give more resources to hospitals, and otherwise carry on as normal, allowing herd immunity to build up naturally. There was never any excuse for locking up the entire population. Instead, we have killed countless elderly in cruel isolation, created an epidemic of mental illness, driven many to despair and suicide, and completely destroyed our economies. Given the considerable resources that continues to be put into propogandizing the population and controlling the patently false media narrative that there “is no alternative,” it stretches credulity to claim this is just bad management.

There are a large number of psychopaths in the population at large who are having their wet dreams of being able to legitimately control other human beings realised by the events of the past year. They are fanatically, hysterically calling for ever more stringent restrictions of the most sadistic nature, from masking small children and depriving them of a social life and education, to locking people in their homes, to condemning the elderly to finishing their lives in solitary confinement with all human contact prohibited. If we continue down this path, as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi warns, humanity will head to its doom.

The Road Ahead to Ruin

The sociopaths driving the Great Reset/aka Agenda 21/aka The Fourth Industrial Revolution/aka Build back Better- have no empathy for us. For them, lockdowns, forced vaccinations and digital IDs are a giant experiment. The end goal is for humanity to be controlled as a kind of sub-species to do the bidding of our overlords without even and free-will, simply chipped and programmed by algorithms while our rulers engage in fantasies of transhumanist immortality. For those who have been following the globalist agenda laid out by the World Economic Forum will already have a good idea of the direction in which we are headed.

Lockdowns will be indefinitely extended. While the precise rules may change and even be temporarily relaxed slightly, they are likely to get much stricter.

Everything will be forced online- shopping, education, health-care, entertainment and ofcourse, social media. Face-to-face meetings will become increasingly rare and unusual. Schools may not fully re-open, f at all. The family unit will come under increasing pressure.

All small and medium-sized businesses including hospitality will fold. Theatre, cinemas, gyms, pubs or restaurants will be a thing of the past for the vast majority of us. Unemployment will increase, along with poverty and eventually real hunger and food shortages.

Business districts in cities will be completely gutted and the entire real estate bought up for pennies on the pound or simply confiscated by the state. As increasing numbers of people will fall into debt, this appropriation of private property will include private homes as well. The vacant premises will be used to house immigrants or those evacuated from the countryside, as populations are herded into densely-packed cities where they can be more closely monitored and controlled. The rollout of 5G technology is intended to provide the infrastructure for constant surveillance.

Eventually, keeping true to the Hegelian-dialectic of problem-reaction-solution, having steered the ship into the iceberg and sunk it, the state will offer desperate citizens a lifeboat: this will take the form of a centralised digital banking system over which they will have complete control, accompanied by the end of cash. At the same time, ID2020 will mean digital health passports for all, perhaps on our phones or some wearable devices, and access to any services including food shops will require this pass.

Once this is achieved, the entire population will have been enslaved and the global elites will have achieved total control over us. Any dissent will simply be met with the state withdrawing- or closing- our digital bank accounts.

Continual vaccination will be enforced as the elites experiment with genetically engineering the surviving members of humanity. The ultimate goal is a self-regulating class of cyborgs who do all the work and provide necessary services, while the elite get to enjoy their self-appointed role of Masters of the Universe. They aspire to use all the world’s resources for their own benefit, and to limit resource use by the slave class (us) to the absolute minimum required to perform essential functions. The ruling class aspire to ultimately achieve eternal life through bio-engineering, and engage in space exploration.

What you can do

Is this rather grim outlook inevitable? No. It can be stopped if there is a mass awakening. The problem is, although this has been characterised as the Third World War, the enemy is everywhere and nowhere- we can see who is driving this assault on humanity, but we are not united. There are many here among us who also have been clamouring for population reduction and totalitarian control for a long time. Misanthropy has been carefully nurtured and propagated through the environmental movement for decades, and many have been conditioned to see their fellow humans as a virus that is spreading out of control. This more than anything else explains how this process is taking place.

But if people could open their eyes to what is happening, understand the pain and suffering caused by the lockdowns, see through the propaganda, stop complying and bring others with them, this could all end very soon.

There are influential groups with at least some power who are making progress. Lawyers are working to prosecute the WHO, scientists and governments for illegally quarantining healthy people, removing their human rights and closing their businesses unlawfully. People are rising up and protesting all over the world, although you will not see any coverage of this in the mainstream media. In Spain, police have started joining the protesters, realising that loss of democracy will affect their lives also.

Keep reading and researching and find out what is really going on. Turn off the TV and find alternative media that will reveal the truth. Freedom-loving people are flocking to Parler, Gab and other alternatives after the recent censorship drive by Big Tech. Although your friends and family will likely reject your ideas as a crazy conspiracy, don’t give up, but keep trying to find kindred sprits. Each on teach one. Spread the word on social media- while you still can. Some groups such as Back To Normal in the UK produce information cards which can be ordered and distributed anywhere you can locally. The most important thing is to network with people who might have some kind of influence in the community, such as lawyers, doctors, teachers or local politicians.

History Professor Timothy Snyder has a useful list of 20 ways of combatting tyranny which is worth reading here.

The reason the people behind this process are winning at the moment because the public simply cannot believe this could be happening. They are sitting back and hoping it will blow over, or that someone else will come and save them That is not going to happen. The global technocratic takeover is underway and they have placed all their cards on the table. For them, there is no going back. If they are somehow stopped now, all will be revealed and we will indeed see a global awakening.

2020 Vision: Reset or Awakening?

More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.

Woody Allen

End of the year and the CCP/WEF flu-detat is well underway around the world. The curtain has been pulled back to reveal that nothing was as we had believed. Lockdowns have changed our reality forever.

This was the year we discovered that governments, health services, and much of the professional class in general care not a wit about human well-being and are so lacking in moral principles and empathy they are prepared to see the collapse of civilisation, the dismantling of freedom and liberal democracy, the descent into fascism and totalitarian control, rather than risk their own careers, reputation or any approbation from their peers. We have discovered finally that we are ruled by psychopaths.

A few relatively simple tricks to ensure maximum fear have allowed the CCP and WEF to rapidly move closer to enslaving humanity: fake PCR tests that can ramp up the number of “cases” at will; a completely bogus idea that you are “infected until proven safe”- the “asymptomatic transmission” scam; the lie Covid-19 is an entirely novel disease with no pre-existing immunity in the population, that is so serious it poses an existential threat to society, and that the spread of a virus can be stopped by suspending all our basic human rights.

The fabrication of truth has been so easy to churn out for months on end once the formula was established. Test like mad, report positive test results as “cases” and show them nightly on a scary-looking graph to terrify the nation. More lockdowns! comes the demented cry Lock them all down! Lock down harder longer! the most frenzied demands coming from the public themselves, but only that class that has not had to close their businesses, who have not lost their jobs, who can comfortably work from home enjoying their Zoom calls. Childless millennials are the worst, the nouveau professional class, ahistorical, apparently unaware of the desperation being caused all around them, oblivious to the collapse of their own society even as they order another Wolt takeout to enjoy during a conference call.

Senior and middle-ranking officials and administrators in all sectors- politics, education, healthcare, media- won’t speak out, although many if most must understand full well what is going on. They want furlough to go on forever, unwilling to do their jobs at all in many cases, happy to stay home on full salary while Rome burns around them. Those heroes that have spoken out are likely to lose their jobs or be turned on by aggressive bloodthirsty Twitter mobs. Many at all levels- a shocking number- are in fact the hardest of hard-core communists, their true colours now showing in a way that could have been guessed perhaps had we been paying more attention to their sympathies with insane climate change goals and calls for population reduction.

Politicians of all stripes are CCP agents or fully signed-up members of the 4th Industrial Revoluton. Carefully put in place, bought or blackmailed by a vast network of Chinese spies who have infiltrated every aspect and level of public and cultural life in the west over decades. To the technocrats, humanity are just rats in a cage to be played with for their own curiosity and benefit.

Once you control the media, you control the narrative, and once you control the narrative, you can, it seems, manipulate entire populations any way you choose. As most people gain all of their information from the Gates-funded mainstream media, which pumps out a constant dirge of fear-porn and scary-looking graphs, all capacity for reason and rational thought has been effectively switched off. Covid-deniers and conspiracy theorists lurk under every bed, maskless maniacs at the cashier waiting to kill your granny.

Propaganda and double-speak are everywhere. I stopped watching the MSM- which I consumed almost exclusively through BBC Radio 4 online- in April when it became inescapable that they had become merely the mouthpiece for government policy. Through social media- Facebook, and then Twitter (which I again started looking at after some years of leaving it aside) I had already seen numerous interviews, and dozens of articles, from world-renowned scientists such as Professor Sunetra Gupta from Oxford with perfectly reasonable, measured and science-based alternatives to economy-destroying lockdowns, that their absence from the mainstream airways was as palpable as gravy missing from Christmas dinner. The BBC has been clearly biased towards climate change alarmism for years, so perhaps I shouldn’t have been so surprised, but to see so clearly the state broadcaster become a British Pravda was stunning.

Equally shocking has been the emergence of a new self-appointed Stazi class. Virtue-signalling has become the primary moral compass, fear its silent police force. A whole new breed of snitches and enforcers have emerged ready to shop you in for flouting lockdown rules. Like the sad busy-bodies in Valley of the Squinting Windows, wannabe Covid-Marshals are everywhere, more than willing to do the government’s enforcement work for them.

“Look at these crazy people- don’t they realise how dangerous this is?!” comes the rabid screams from social media underneath photos of people out cycling or walking in the park, as the most basic everyday pleasures and harmless activities became outlawed and viewed as vile depravities overnight back in March.

Everything fun is banned. This is the new Protestantism, a new Prohibition. Echoing Greta Thunberg- who abruptly disappeared from view when the pandemic struck but now seems to have paved the way for this flood of self-righteousness- they relish in their indignation at their fellow citizens- How dare people want to have normal lives and enjoy themselves! How dare young people go out and party! How dare people want to see their families, be social animals, meet friends, travel! How dare they, in a word, want to be human, express and fulfil their humanity! Now all these poor, sad, empty, emotionally crippled beings among us can find meaning and fulfil their true destiny of telling the rest of us how to live our lives.

I am not guiltless or immune myself. Back in March for the first lockdown, instilled with fear by the infamous viral article by CCP-agent Pueyo (whose online teaching company made $80m off the back of the lockdowns he himself helped to enforce) to socially-distance, I terrorised my own family into eating separately, avoiding contact and wearing masks -over mouth AND nose- gripped by my own rational understanding, so I thought, of the potential exponential growth rate in infections. “The hospitals will be over-whelmed!” I intoned daily for a while. But even then I knew lockdowns could not possibly be a long-term policy for civil society without causing untold destruction.

What shocks me more than anything is societies’ willingness to mask and socially distance children. We look out the window at the yard where residents walk their dogs to see a father and young child, no more than 2 or 3 years old, wearing a mask. Outside, with no-one else nearby. Children are immune to Covid, and there has been not a single case found of a child under the age of 10 transmitting the virus to an adult in mountains of data, but even if there was some risk, surely anyone can see that putting a mask on a child is wrong. Yet in some countries, masks are mandated for children and teenagers even in class, for several hours a day. How has this been possible? Parents and teachers alike are culpable in this child abuse. If parents are so easily manipulated into surrendering the well-being of their own children in such a basic way, what hope is there for any sense returning to the world? Children being born from this year will grow up wearing masks their whole lives without ever knowing normality.

How could we not have seen this coming? The infiltration of civil society by far-left ideology has been going on for decades. I was lucky enough to have had in my education a course on sociology that taught me the problems with post-modernism, which undermines any sense of Truth or Reality. “Create your own reality!” is the New Age adage, conveniently absolving you from any responsibility and side-stepping all the awkwardness and challenges of daily life that help us grow and mature. But after years of flirting with such cultural relativism, and then becoming an environmentalist going through Deep Ecology and the Peak Oil movement, fearing ecological collapse and resource-depletion, I became persuaded that in fact humanity had the capacity to continually adapt and innovate, and that progress through science and technology was still possible far into the future.

More recent warnings that Google and Big Tech were collecting all our data and could be a threat to democracy did not worry me- so what if they send me useful adverts for stuff I like? How wrong I was. Now we see how perniciously the seductive power of social media has been, luring us into giving up all our privacy, merrily sharing everything about every aspect of our lives with technocrats who do have sinister and evil intent.

“Some morning people will awake to discover with surprise that quite a few gentle and kind things have begun to have offensive and lethal characteristics.

Unrestricted Warfare Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui 1999

The frog is nicely boiling. From three weeks to flatten the curve to permanent lockdown, many seem to be only too willing to give up their liberty for less than a song, with no concept of how hard it was was won for them by their forebears. They cannot see what is happening to them even as the noose tightens, unwilling to accept they might have been wrong, balking at the more terrifying truth- that their government has been lying to them and will quite happily see their lives destroyed- than give up the illusion that one more lockdown and this will all be over. For others, the moral superiority gained by chastising others for “breaking the rules” is a vindication, giving a sense of purpose and self-worth previously missing. Divide and rule. Rising “cases” is always because someone else broke the rules and never because trying to stop a virus is like trying to stop the waves.

What lies in store for 2021? I will explore two scenarios:

The Great Reset

Almost certainly the year will start with longer and harder lockdowns everywhere. The next phase of the Great Reset will be implemented after the WEF have their annual get-together at Davos in January. Vaccine rollouts will continue apace, digital health passports brought into some countries quite soon. New killer strains of Covid will be discovered, perhaps a more deadly version Covid 20/21, or perhaps the threatened cyber attack, leading to further, ever more punitive lockdowns, testing how much we can endure. Economic collapse will ensue by the summer, the ranks of the homeless and the starving will swell, the elderly infirm and disabled will be sacrificed as health and food systems crumble. Survivors will be offered the salvation of digital currencies in exchange for surrendering any property they have left, and succumbing to total digital surveillance. Ongoing DNA-altering vaccines will be injected on a regular basis, finally allowing the new Masters of the Universe their goal of genetically engineered and remotely-controlled sub-class of cyborgs to be created to support them indefinitely while they enhance their own bodies and minds to extend their lifespans to approaching immortality and begin to finally explore the cosmos in earnest. The Great Reset will have been implemented and a new era of Transhumanism has begun.

The Great Resist and Awakening

On January 6th Trump begins to turn the tables after a vast rally of supporters descend on Washington D.C. for the electoral college votes. Courts demand recounts in the key states and the world is shocked to the core as the election result of November is overturned and Trump is returned to the Whitehouse for a second term.

Allegations of election fraud begin to be taken seriously. Court cases ensue, at first against low-ranking electoral officials, but the scandal starts to rise and pressure eventually is brought against Biden, senior and junior, for corruption and collusion with a foreign power. Charges of treason begin to be talked about.

The Democrats call foul and the first few months see a repeat of 2016 with a substantial part of the country chanting “Not My President!” Violence breaks out in many cities between Antifa and Trump supporters, eventually quelled by the National Guard. Unabashed, a triumphant Trump tours the country, lockdowns are ended in all but the most hard-core Blue States, and a very shaky economic recovery begins as businesses and schools re-open. Section 230 is repealed and Google, Facebook and Twitter broken up. A full investigation into electoral fraud and the role of China is instigated. A purge against CCP operatives is undertaken. Diplomatic ties between China and the US are placed under great strain and there is increasing talk of a cold or even hot war. Amazon is taken to court for tax evasion.

Trump’s Warp Speed vaccine program continues but is brought to a halt by Easter with growing concerns about side-effects. RNA vaccines are shelved pending much more rigorous testing procedures.

In Europe, Reiner Fuellmich’s case is brought against Drosten and Tedros and injunctions granted. The ICC starts proceedings against the WHO for crimes against humanity. Widespread protests against lockdowns in many cities gather momentum and, following Italy at the end of 2020, more and more courts rule against the use of PCR testing to enforce quarantines and curfews. One by one, countries start to role back from lockdowns as new more reliable lateral flow tests are introduced, revealing that the spread of Covid is now minimal.

Lockdowns are ended in the UK where a Covid Crimes Tribunal is brought against members of the British Government including the Prime Minister and Health Secretary. A new election is called after a large-scale Conservative back-bench revolt, and a new government coalition is formed between the Heritage Party and Reclaim. For the first time in British history, a Constitution is written in which it is enshrined that the government can never again have the power to impose any kind of lockdown restrictions, or quarantine the healthy, without a referendum and full parliamentary oversight again.


We have been conned into destroying much of what is good and true and beautiful in the world for a virus overall not much more than a bad flu, with a survival rate of 99.8%, much higher even for younger age groups. Now we can see this was possible, perhaps we have to ask, is our society really worth saving anyway? At the very least, we have to accept that we have profound flaws in our make-up as a species, flaws and blindspots which make us vulnerable to groupthink, and an immense propensity to self-delusion. I have always believed that humanity contains the best and worst of everything, but this is the year we discovered that the extent of human evil goes far further than most could have imagined.

Will we be able to find within us something far better as well, that can elevate us out of this dire situation onto some higher plain of consciousness and finally achieve a Great Awakening?

A Convergence of Conspiracies

Is Covid a Conspiracy or a Cock-up?

They want to get more control, and it’s going to be quarantines and curfews. Unless the American people start to find some new way to revolt, a new way to organise, unless we can break through the apathy…. then it’s going to be a slave state here. The ruling class doesn’t seem to have too much resistance, they are getting everything on their Christmas shopping list, and they’ve been wanting curfews and quarantines for a long time, now they got it. And if you want to live in a world where you are tricked into all this stuff, because it’s ‘for your safety’, and if you want o have a probe, and have to check your pockets, and be monitored every time you step out of your house… if you want to have that world, then be apathetic, don’t do anything, you’re gonna get that world, it’s coming your way very soon, definitely.

Wake up, learn about it, and go and fight these bastards in Washington, they are easy to beat, if we can just organise, we can beat them. It’s simple, they are weak, and there are so few of them.

Harry Vox, NYC, 2014

Toby Young’s blog has been a beacon of data-driven rational thought and common sense amongst the insanity of Covidianism that has dominated the past year. A one-stop shop covering everything from ICU occupancy to eye-witness accounts of the latest protests, the blog has brought together some of the leading scientists and commentators in Britain and the world to challenge Covid orthodoxy and call for a more balanced approach.

Although not unaware of darker forces operating behind the scenes, Toby has consistently stuck to his guns when it comes it comes to conspiracy theories, rejecting the idea that the corona pandemic has been orchestrated by shady cabals, deep states, China, or Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset. Instead, he refers us to Hanlon’s Razor:

“never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”.

For Toby, the British government’s catastrophic handling of the pandemic can better be explained by a mixture of incompetence, group-think, an over-reliance on a very narrow range of “experts”, and a coincidental convergence of vested interests. After the initial knee-jerk reaction of lockdown in the spring, a moral panic was sustained through constant media fear-mongering, leading to the public demanding ever-more stringent measures, and the government responding in turn in a vicious cycle of self-destruction.

Toby’s friend and conservative ally James Delingpole- whose 2012 book Watermelons covers the Dark Marxist intentions of the environmental movement- has a different take, and the two of them have been duking it out on their podcast London Calling.

James suggests Toby should look into the Great Reset, Agenda 2021/30 and the role of China, and believes that the catastrophic events of 2020 the intentional results of decades of malevolent planning. How else, he asks, would you explain how a virus no worse than the 2017/8 ‘flu is being used to destroy the economy, and that we are now told we have to accept a “new normal” of social distancing, masks and lockdowns, without so much as a debate? How else can we explain, for example, the rendering of London, one of the greatest cities in the world, to a mere a husk, with this year being the equivalent of “ISIS going into Mosul” ?

Toby isn’t buying it though- what is their agenda? How are they benefitting by laying waste to the global economy? “There won’t be any world left for them to rule”. He explains the draconian response as being a “convergence of opportunism”, with an incompetent government digging deeper and deeper holes as it doubles-down on doing everything to limit Covid casualties, fearing it will be blamed for these but not for any collateral damage. “History is fundamentally driven by incompetence and stupidity.”

In a column he wrote in response to these spats, Toby writes of James:

 the coronavirus pandemic seems to have destroyed his internal filter. Bill Gates has gone from being just another liberal billionaire to an evil super-villain with a diabolical agenda — a cross between Ernst Stavro Blofeld and Megamind. He is the puppet master who is plotting to roll out a mass vaccination program, not to protect people from getting COVID-19, but so he can implant microchips in their brains. I’ve never quite got to the bottom of why James believes this — what’s Gates’s objective, exactly, other than to make even more money? It’s something to do with enslaving the human race, but to what purpose I’m not sure.

It is certainly true that the controlled destruction of the economy is counter-intuitive if you assume that the cabal behind the coup are thinking just in terms of money. We are used to simply “following the money” and assuming that the ruling class would at least like to see economic growth, if only for themselves to steal more of it. That’s capitalism, right?

When I first heard of lockdowns, I was astonished they could be considered in western societies, because of the obvious cost to the economy- not to mention the suspension of human rights. When they arrived in Europe, I assumed they could not possibly be sustained for long. When they were repeated in the autumn, and are now continuing into the winter and through to next spring, it is obvious that there is another agenda. But what?

As James alluded, what we are dealing with here is something completely new. The technocrats from the World Economic Forum, in collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party, want nothing short of total control , and they will stop at nothing to get it. This means the enslavement of the human race. Forever.

Just as Stalin eliminated the kulaks -the prosperous peasant class- in the Soviet Union in the “Great Break” of collectivisation of 1929-32, the controlled elimination of the middle-classes through lockdowns, coupled with the astronomical government debt incurred by furloughs, will create complete dependency on the state. The ability to be an entrepreneur, to earn your own living by your own wits, will be replaced by a Universal Basic Income. The idea of a UBI has been around for some time, and it is a dangerous idea, because dependency means loss of liberty in very tangible ways.

Plans are also afoot for the end of cash, which will be supplanted by a centrally controlled digital currency. Feel like tweeting something agains the government restrictions? Your account may be frozen- and there will be nothing you can do about it. ID2020 is the plan for total digital surveillance of every citizen in the world, with digital health or “immunity” passports recording your vaccine status already being widely discussed. Modelled on the Chinese social credit system and powered by millions of 5G substations, face-recognition cameras and digital bar-codes giving or denying access to every service based on your credit rating, the infrastructure started to appear in the west for some time before Corona.

Driving all this is the psychopathic cult of Technocracy. Patrik Wood’s book Technocracy Rising follows the emergence of what can best be seen as a technocratic cult from a cauldron of ideologies including eugenics, Marxism and Fabian socialism in the 1920s. This is not a political movement according to Wood, but rather an ideology that aims to supplant politics once and for all with technocratic social engineering. The whole of human society will be reduced to energetic units, all behaviour controlled to the level of inputs and outputs of a system. We can see the workings of this clearly in the obsession with R-numbers and models, the technocratic sermons delivered by government advisors such as the UK health advisors Vallance and Whitty. Only the measurable is valid, all other human concerns left by the wayside as irrelevances, all human agency surrendered to the edicts of technocratic experts.

Simply put, they believed that the actions of human beings, both direct and indirect, were the root cause of societal problems and that they were directly related to biology, climate and natural resources. The absence of enlightened scientific management would doom mankind to certain destruction. It is not coincidental that the most visible and manipulative modern agents of change – Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, global warming, the U.N.’s green economy and the modern ecology movement, etc. – all hold to the same underlying assumptions.

Patrik Wood, Technocracy Rising, 2014

To believe that there has not been intense, international and co-ordinated planning over many years to instigate unprecedented changes to every aspect of our lives almost overnight is to ignore extensive documentation of the evidence.

Can we really explain the astronomical., unprecedented debt the government has racked up, and the inevitable total social and economic collapse that will soon follow, as “group think” gone wrong and too much reliance on the scientific advisors? Rather, this is the logical next step in a communist take-over: this will be have to be paid back by the tax-payer. Hyper-inflation, massive tax increases and capital levies will follow. Pensions will be raided, savings drained. Eventually, your property will be commandeered. The state will own everything and there will be no way or surviving outside of this dystopian new world.

“You will own nothing, and be happy” states a WEF promotional video for what might be in store for us in 2030.

How do we account for the fact that the majority of western governments around the world are apparently acting in lockstep? The world’s media- mainstream and digital- all sing from the same hymn-sheet, ignoring and censoring alternatives proposed by thousands of scientists of global standing? The abrupt U-turn by the WHO in March on many aspects of epidemiological advice, from asymptomatic transmission, to mask-wearing, to lockdowns? Is it really a conspiracy mindset to have serious questions when Bill Gates- a vaccine salesman who has no medical training, but who has been foisting vaccines on the developing world for years- is repeatedly wheeled out by the BBC to tell us we have to cower in our homes until the whole world is vaccinated?

The evidence of a grand plan to take over the world is unfortunately all there in plain sight, not a conspiracy theory, but a conspiracy fact, not an accidental convergence of short-term vested interests, but a convergence of long-standing ambitions of powerful elites who have indeed conspired for decades to gain control of the whole world.

Cultural anthropologist Aya Velázquez has a great analysis of the diabolical collaboration that has brought together China with “The Great Reset”:

Many people are asking themselves in the corona crisis why the countries of the earth are acting so synchronously, as if they were already under the leadership of an invisible “Corona World Government”. During the relentless ascent of China and descent of the USA, new transnational circles of power have long since arisen out of the dying empire: Big Data, Big Pharma, and Big Money. Remarkably enough, they find themselves in a historic and unique convergence of interests with China; “Stay Home!”, social distancing, the destruction of the middle class, the “reset” of the crumbling global economic system and the associated, historically unprecedented movement of capital from the bottom to the top benefits them all. The imperial ambitions of China and Western corporate globalists are not currently opposed to each other as long as everyone gets his piece of the pie. China propagates lockdowns worldwide to economically weaken its opponents and to export its own cultural model.

China has been infiltrating the west for decades, carefully buying up businesses, stealing technology, and extending cultural hegemony through our universities, so much so that Imperial College- which spawned the Ferguson’s notorious models of doom early in the pandemic- is best seen as a foreign office of the CCP.

Western oligarchs have similarly been working behind the scenes as the “Deep State” through the Trilateral Commission to transform every aspect of local governance. Their most important vehicle has been Agenda 21, a supposedly environmental programme which has been adopted by every city and local council in the world, but is actually a cover for the total control of all resources, land, nature and capital.

The idea of accelerating these plans using a staged pandemic has also been around for a while. In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation produced Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development which outlines the “Lockstep” future scenario with uncannily close resemblance to the events of 2020, wherein a pandemic leads to

A world of tighter top-down government control and more
authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing
citizen pushback

Harry Vox, quoted at the top of this blog, warned that failure to pay attention to these scenarios, would lead to the US becoming a “slave state”:

Much of these transformative plans are laid out in detail in the book published in the summer by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, Covid-19- the Great Reset. Despite knowing that Covid is a mild disease, Schwab sees Covid-19 as the crisis that must not go to waste, that should be used for a rapid transformation to allow global governance under the auspices of the “4th Industrial Revolution”, including the digitalisation of everything and ultimately to fulfil his transhumanist agenda.

Hancock and Johnson are fully onboard with this agenda and work closely with the WEF. A vast surveillance and propaganda machine has already been created by the British government, drawing on decades of psychological studies of how to change human behaviour with fear and other manipulation.

Governments could easily back out of the lockdowns at this stage, claiming (falsely) success as herd immunity builds up and the virus becomes less virulent. At this stage, any government that begins cautiously re-opening the economy, allowing businesses to continue, letting children go back to school, and restoring civil liberties, would be praised and revered as saviours. Instead, as the crisis enters 2021, we are seeing ever more destructive policies, ever more insane fear-mongering, a move deeper and deeper into irrationality and anti-science, and an increasing awareness amongst the population that this nightmare is never going to end.

No doubt there are strong elements of “convergent opportunism” that has allowed this all to happen. For the lower echelons of administrative power, simply taking the money, following orders to keep jobs, accepting the whip from peer groups and witch hunts, buying into the need for top-down control over the population that has been pushed for years via climate change and socialist networks, has become an almost inevitable reaction in these circumstances for all but a few brave whistleblowers.

There is no yearning, as Toby Young suggests James Delingpole has, for a “simple” explanation of some evil mastermind behind the curtain. The curtain has long since been drawn back for those with eyes to clearly see. Rather, the truth that is revealed is so much worse than a mere virus- which together we would surely find the strength and ingenuity to defeat- that instead we would give nearly anything for it not to be true.

How China took over the World

In a remarkable viral video of a speech given last month in Shanghai, Di Dingsheng, Associate Dean of International Studies at Beijing’s Renmin University, boasts of how China influences American foreign policy through its ties with people at the top of American politics, particularly in Wall Street-

“It’s because we have people at the top. At the top of America’s core inner circle of power and influence, we have our old friends.” He explains how the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) supports Biden because they lost influence when Trump engaged in trade war with China.

When recounting an anecdote about persuading a major US bookstore in Washington, D.C. to host a book launch event for one of his political allies at short notice, Dingsheng explains to laughter from his audience, “there’s nothing in the world that money can’t fix, right? If one wad of cash can’t do it, then I have two wads. Ofcourse, this is how I do things.”

Last week an even more extraordinary leak came to light, exposing the details of more than 2million CCP members working for major financial institutions, corporations, and government agencies all over the world, which “lifts the lid on how the party operates under President and Chairman Xi Jinping”. While this might not be surprising in an of itself, Iain Duncan Smith writes how “The CCP demands secrecy, cunning and utterly ruthless discipline from its millions of members” and how it represents an existential threat to the west, aiming to “destroy our way of life”.

It is perhaps no coincidence that the staged pandemic has taken place in the year of the US elections. A key goal for China has been to eliminate Trump, and the pandemic has not only dealt a severe blow to the US economy which would otherwise have ensured his widepsread support, but also forced millions of votes to be made by postal ballot, opening the potential for voter fraud- something that is still working its way through the US courts. Trump found himself wrong-footed and boxed in by the pandemic, it being very bad press to be seen to be not taking public health seriously. This silent coup – if successful- has been a masterclass in Sun Tzu’s The Art of War.

Michael Senger has documented the key role China has played in foisting lockdowns on an unsuspecting west in the wake of the corona pandemic. In a series of tweets, he has shown how China has been infiltrating almost every aspect of western public life in order to subvert our political and social system. A key part of this strategy has been the finding – and thereby control of- western universities. For example, so important to China was the relationship with Imperial college London that Xi Jingping personally visited the college in 2015 to endorse the Chinese funding of its programmes. The significance of this becomes clear when considering the huge influence played by the Imperial College modelling to scare the Britain and much of the world in catastrophic lockdowns.

Lockdowns are based originally on Chinese premiere Xi Jinping’s concept of fankong, the health and security policy seen in the forced quarantining of a million Uighar muslims. The lockdown of 57million Hubei residents in February was unprecedented, and certainly not based on any previous “science” of dealing with pandemics. The next step was simple- the Chinese-controlled WHO then quickly moved to advocate it for the rest of the world once China claimed it had been successful at containing the virus. Italy was their first testing ground in the west, because of Italy’s close ties to China- and indebtedness- through the Belt and road initiative. Chinese observers were sent to Italy in March to supervise and ensure the lockdown was severe enough. Everyone else just lined up and followed suit.

In this Twitter thread, Senger argues that lockdowns are part of a much deeper plan “to make the world China”, and that they were modelled on the WEF’s Event 201 of October 2019 “so Gates, Hopkins, and the WEF would play into their hands.”

Although China’s goals have been aligned with those of the technocrats and WEF Great Reset, Senger suggests they may dump the western elites in the end:

28/ (In truth, of course, Xi detests no one more than decadent Western oligarchs. In due time they would discover their corporations belonged to Xi, their services were no longer required, and now they had no country left to defend them).

(This brings to mind the end of Ben Elton’s sci-fi novel Stark in which the global elites all end up killing each other in the end as once they have taken over the world they find they cannot stand each other.)

From early in the year, panic was ramped up to the maximum by a continual stream of alarmist propaganda including fake videos of people collapsing in the streets of Wuhan, and, importantly, the CCP’s “medical guidance” which was deliberately aimed at increasing the death rate. This was achieved firstly by use of ventilators- which killed rather than cured patients; the forced movement of patients from hospitals into care homes, resulting in thousands of premature deaths which were ascribed to “Covid”; and then effects of the lockdowns themselves including the cessation of other medical treatments. These have all been copied in the west resulting in a spike in deaths not from Covid, but as a deliberate result of government policy. The frighteningly high death rate- which continues to be exaggerated by bogus PCR tests performed on all hospital in-patients- – is then used of course to justify continual lockdowns.

A key part of China’s propaganda campaign involved the use of Twitter bots- although Senger points out China has the man-power to flood the west with actual tweets written by human trolls. Apart from spreading scare-mongering about the severity of the virus, these were used to devastating effect to change the British government’s soft initial approach that initially looked to be more like Sweden’s.

Lockdowns had never been used before in history. In fact, as we have seen, they were specifically excluded from official advice by the WHO and other public health bodies, because they are ineffective in controlling a virus, and have devastating negative impacts on a whole range of sectors across society- education, employment, the elderly, mental health and medical care.

Senger notes wryly:

There’s dark humor in the CCP’s use of a common coronavirus for its lockdown fraud. Perhaps in Xi’s mind, if the West was so spineless as to destroy itself over a common cold, was it really worth saving?

Keeping everyone at home facilitates greater surveillance, again playing into China’s hand as the share price of Chinese-owned Zoom – which is monitored by the CCP- soared and the roll-out of Huawei’s 5G network accelerates. Censorship of dissent was facilitated through compliant Big Tech companies who also benefit from the lockdowns that keep everyone online. As furlough payments escalate national debts, national bankruptcies force countries to sell everything to China, which ended its lockdown long ago and is booming once again. It is China’s world now.

Coronavirus: A visual guide to the economic impact - BBC News

China has long sought to destabilise the west, which has taken its eye off the ball and been lulled into a false sense of security, believing economic growth would bring them closer to western democratic values. This has been a mistake of historic proportions. China has always played the long game and see themselves as being the only dominant and legitimate nation in the world. They are now close to achieving the global domination they see as their destiny.

Crimes Against Humanity

How PCR tests were used to fraudulently stage a pandemic

In 2009 Global elites tried to hijack the world’s economy and impose forced vaccination across much of the world by staging a false pandemic . In what Council of Europe health specialist Dr Wolfgang Wodarg called “one of the greatest medical scandals of the century”, the WHO downgraded the definition of a “pandemic” to encompass any infectious disease that becomes widespread, rather than one that necessarily causes high levels of fatalities. They were then able to declare a high level 5 “pandemic” for the virus, when, absurdly, the revised definition would have also qualified seasonal flu- which kills up to 650,000 people annually around the world– as being at the same level of threat.

The CDC claimed there were 22million cases in the US even after it had been revealed that there was no pandemic at all, and most people counted as “cases” had no infection. Ultimately some 3,900 fatalities were recorded in the US, against 10x that for seasonal flu in an average year. The WHO and the CDC in the US advocated for all Americans to take the vaccine. The false alarm gave way to many unintended consequences and absurd over-reactions.

In the event, some 60million people were vaccinated across Europe, with about 60 children ultimately receiving payouts from vaccine manufacturer Smith Glaxo Kline to the tune of a million euros each for permanent brain damage resulting from the vaccine.

Channel 4 news covered this at the time, so it was widely acknowledged in the MSM as a hoax:

The efforts of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, chair of the health subcommittee of Europe, in stopping the scam were crucial. Eleven years later and we seeing a repeat of the same scamdemic- though this time on a global scale after global elites, lead by the World Economic Forum, working in tandem with the CCP (Chinese Communist Party), introduced lockdowns as universal public policy.

Along with ex-Pfizer chief since advisor Dr. Mike Yeadon, Wodarg has now called for a stop to vaccine trials, over safety concerns and that the “trials” are based not on subjects developing Covid-Symptoms, but merely on testing positive with a PCR test.

PCR “pseudo-epidemics” based on false-positives have happened before also inadvertently, as with the 2007 false whooping cough epidemic in New Hampshire.

Just as today with “swine flu 2.0” aka Covid-19, the WHO also tried to use the swine flu as a pretext for sweeping global political changes including redistribution of wealth and “social justice”.

Crimes Against Humanity

Wodarg is now also working with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, the German Lawyer and member of the German Corona Investigative Committee, who is suing the WHO and others who have perpetrated the PCR testing scam which underpins the pandemic response of lockdowns and quarantining anyone who tests positive.

Fuellmich has a long history of suing giant corporations, having successfully taken action against Deutsch Bank and VW in the past. Together with a team of lawyers in Germany, he has been hearing expert testimony since July. In the video above, he describes how he has so far filed a complaint for defamation against YouTube/Big Tech-funded “fact checkers” who claim Dr. Wodarg has lied in claiming that PCR tests do not detect infection.

There is no scientist in this world who would claim PCR tests can detect infections

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Fuellmich identified the PCR tests as the cornerstone of the “staged pandemic” that is Covid-19. He explains that his strategy is to go after specific individuals who are out in the open, who have demonstrably lied to the public, specifically:

It is true that the German Government has massively lobbied more than any other country with its main protagonists of this so-called coronavirus pandemic, Mr Drosten, virologist at Charité Hospital in Berlin, Mr Wieler, head of Rki, German equivalent of the CDC, and Mr Tedros, director of the World Health Organization. organization or WHO, because Germany is a well-known country for its discipline and should have become a model for the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to anti-coronavirus measures.

Drosten, it turns out , had claimed falsely to be professor, yet had not even written a thesis, yet it was his paper on the PCR tests, rushed out and published in record time in February this year, that were so enthusiastically endorsed by the WHO who advocated governments around the world to use as the basis for lockdowns and the quarantining of anyone who tested positive- even though the test can tell us nothing of an individual’s infectiousness.

This paper has now been challenged by a group of leading experts, including Yeadon and others, finding multiple flaws, and demanding for it to be retracted. It wasn’t peer-reviewed, and multiple conflicts of interest have been found.

Meanwhile Tedros, the director of the WHO, is the first to hold that position not to be a medical doctor. In fact, his past is far more shady, having been a high-ranking member of a Marxist terrorist organisation in Ethiopia, and has been accused of covering up cholera outbreaks in his own country and implicated with other human rights abuses.

Fuellmich discusses the earlier swine flu false-pandemic, citing other individuals who were also responsible for that event, including Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, whose model predictions of huge death-tolls was influential in scaring the world into lockdowns over corona but in fact has a long history of scaremongering.

In the end he says, it will be the governments who will be held responsible for reparations to the public for injury, death, loss of livelihood resulting from hysterical policies in response to Covid-19. He believes he can show that Merkel, for example, relied entirely on this one “expert”, Drosten, in forming her lockdown policies.

They are filing these lawsuits now, Fuellmich explains because “only now are people beginning to realise this won’t be over soon.” He is confident, he says, that they will be able to bring down not only the visible actors who have clearly lied to the public, but “those behind them who are pulling their strings” – including funders such as Bill Gates, and others.

“Don’t worry! There is no single monolithic antagonist behind all of this. There are actually different competing groups, and some who seem not to really know what they are doing. If we stay focussed, we will get them in the end. We will win!”

The world is waiting with baited breath to hear dome good news from Dr. Fuellmich.

For now, I will finish with an interview with Kary Mullis, the Nobel-prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, on experts, tests and how an earlier, well-known pandemic was also exaggerated for financial gain:

Vaccine for the masses

No sooner had the WHO elevated SARS-COV-2 to the status of “pandemic” back in March, and the world dutifully locked down, Bill Gates was on telly telling the world the only way we would ever “feel safe” being in close proximity to each other again would be with a vaccine. Not just a vaccine for the vulnerable- but for all 7 billion of us on planet earth. To say the least, this seems somewhat to have been jumping the gun considering there was little experience with dealing with the new virus in other ways, nor could its ultimate health impacts have been properly assessed. You very much got the impression he just couldn’t wait.

Gates has been long associated with goals of “vaccinating the world”, which “conspiracy theorists” have claimed has been a cover for a plan to covertly reduce the world’s population. I used to be a fan of Gates, having been duped into accepting him as a philanthropist, and supported his promotion of nuclear power and vaccines in the developing world. I was aware of some of the controversies around this, but it seemed that accusations of population reduction were over-blown- he just wanted to support a demographic transition by reducing infant mortality in some developing countries, thereby lowering the birth rate and giving people more choice.

Immediately leaping into action, Gates invested billions in several vaccine projects, on the basis that it would be too early to pick a winner, and to speed things up we would need to start manufacturing billions of vaccines long before safety testing had been completed. The single-minded focus on vaccines has been evident from the start- never mind therapeutics, increasing investments in hospitals or protecting the vulnerable- no, the goal all along has been to shoot something into the arm of each an every one of us. The British PM Boris Johnson has met online with Gates and is working closely with him, saying he will be

using UK’s G7 presidency next year to bring in a global health plan with expertise from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and partnership with Wellcome Trust.

When asked about his motives, Gates could hardly contain his excitement as he explained he could get a 20:1 return on vaccines- “that’s pretty good compared to most other business”. You can find this clip, and a great deal more fascinating- and disturbing- information about Gates, in this film by James Corbett, one of a series:

Vaccines or eternal lockdown -this has been the Faustian choice we have been forced into making. “Health passports” to regain permission to travel were mooted from early on. Compulsory vaccination- implicitly or otherwise- means the biggest captive market in history, but apart from generating billions and eventually trillions in profits to Gates and the companies that develop the vaccines, vaccines pave the way to global biometric surveillance, one of the goals of the WEF’s Great Reset.

Now the vaccine is here. Pfizer’s experimental RNA vaccine was first off the mark and the UK has won the race to be the first country in the world to licence it, raising the ire of both the EU and the US but claiming it as one of the first wins for Brexit.

With skepticism about vaccines already widespread, getting widespread voluntary acceptance was always going to be an issue. Some polls show up to a third of Britains would be unlikely to take it, while many others will be queueing up to get the shot in the hope they will gan their freedom and a return to normality.

They might be disappointed. The government accepts that it is unknown whether the vaccine prevents transmission from those who have had it, meaning they will still have to self-isolate if they are contacted by track and trace:

People who get vaccinated will have to stick to the same rules as everyone else because we don’t know if it stops people being carriers and passing the virus on to others.

But why do we need a vaccine anyway for a disease that is mild or not life-threatening for nearly everyone who isn’t already suffering from a life-threatening condition, when there is growing evidence of pre-existing and/or herd immunity?

Since there is no evidence or justification for lockdowns or social distancing in the first place, and there is a solid alternative proposed in the Great Barrington Declaration supported by thousands of top scientists which has been conspicuously ignored by most governments, why would we believe our overlords would release us from house arrest and let businesses re-open after a vaccine anyway, even if there were high uptake?

Nor are concerns about the safety and efficacy confined to fringe “conspiracy theorists”. Senior scientists have also raised concerns.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former head of respiratory research at Pfizer, together with former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed an application to the regulatory authority calling for an immediate cessation of all vaccine trials. They ask the public to support them by signing a prepared email, (linked to on the same page). In an interview on TalkRadio, Yeadon explains that there is so far little evidence that it can stop infections:

Their concerns are about the trial design which precludes third-stage animal testing. This is an essential part of a vaccine trial protocol because it is known from similar vaccines that there is a risk that the vaccine may promote a dangerous immune response when confronted with the “wild” virus, something that ethics preclude testing on human subjects. The vaccine has in fact been licensed while stage three testing is ongoing, expected to continue for another two years, meaning that the population are literally taking an experimental vaccine- they are themselves the trial subjects, according to the Corbett report. The vaccine is not it seems being tested on anyone over 70 years old, the most vulnerable group and arguably the only ones who might actually need a vaccine.

Pfizer themselves accept that adverse events- including flu symptoms of varying degrees of severity– may be common after the vaccine, and the British government advises against pregnant women taking the vaccine.

The vaccine, and likely most others, will require two doses to work, injections that must be given weeks apart, company protocols show. Scientists anticipate that the shots will cause enervating flu-like side effects — including sore arms, muscle aches and fever — that could last days and temporarily sideline some people from work or school. And even if a vaccine proves 90 percent effective, the rate Pfizer touted for its product, 1 in 10 recipients would still be vulnerable. That means, at least in the short term, as population-level immunity grows, people can’t stop social distancing and throw away their masks.

There are good reasons to require a high level of safety testing for vaccines. Glaxo Smith Kline was found liable for payments of over £60million after its swine flu vaccine was found to cause brain damage in approx. 1 in 16,000. Some 60m children were given the vaccine across Europe after the outbreak in 2009.

The BMJ has also expressed concerns that the trials are not designed to tell if the vaccine will actually save lives.

 None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.

Apart from the astonishing cost of delivering vaccinations to millions of people for a country which has already destroyed much of its economy through lockdowns, all of these concerns may be mute if the vaccine is entirely voluntary. Yet despite assertions from Johnson that there are no plans to make it compulsory, the Welsh government has already got Covid ID cards in the pipeline, while Tony Blair claims that it is “absolutely clear” Health passports will be needed for international travel, as at least one airline, Quantus, has already indicated.

Van Tam, the Deputy Health Officer has given a rather mixed message:

If you want that dream to come true as quickly as it can come true, then you have to take the vaccine when it’s offered to you,… Low uptake will almost certainly make restrictions last longer.

while insisting restrictions will remain in place anyway and “this is not the time for a massive party.”

So what’s the point then? The British government has bought millions doses of vaccines without any clear idea of what they can do, or what is in them, before safety testing is complete, and apparently with little expectation they will do much to end lockdowns anytime soon. Moreover, Pfizer has been protected from any legal action by the British government– which is a condition from the company of making the vaccine available.

Given Gates’ messianic zeal to get the whole of humanity vaccinated probably several times as soon as is humanly possible, can we really have confidence that the intention is not to place serious coercive pressure on the public to line up for the shot? Alternative, much cheaper and less invasive approaches to managing the virus have been conspicuously ignored since the start of the outbreak in favour of a single technological approach that seems to pointedly guarantee the massive transfer of wealth from the taxpayer to giant pharmaceutical companies.

It is not “anti-vaccination” to ask for clarification of these points, but it is anti-science to claim, as Hancock persists in doing, that Covid is a “really serious disease” when for 95% of the population, this is simply not true. The fact is, the case for vaccines has not been made, and given that so many of our fundamental rights have already been removed during the lockdowns, with no clear pathway to getting them back, we have every reason to be concerned about malicious, deceptive plans to enforce vaccination on us regardless of the science.

This would contravene the Nuremburg Code, “the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.” Now is a good time to read it and share it. Its first injunction reads as follows:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

Three deceptions driving the Corona Hysteria

“It’s outrageous. This is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting population,”

 Dr. Roger Hodkinson, the CEO of Western Medical Assessments.

Covid-19 is a serious respiratory illness that caused a lot of deaths amongst elderly and vulnerable people in the spring of 2020. Now however the pandemic is largely over and it is understood a lot of immunity is present in the community, and for the vast majority it is a relatively minor disease. Rather than lifting punitive restrictions most countries are doubling down with new lockdowns designed it seems to destroy small and medium-sized businesses. The panic surrounding Covid could disappear if people could just see through three primary deceptions driving the hysterical policy over-reactions:

1. PCR Tests are meaningless

Dr. Hodkinson, A Royal College certified pathologist in Canada, and CEO of a COVID-19 testing lab in Alberta, has been recorded stating some home truths about the response to the corona pandemic in a recent telephone conversation.

Taking aim at masks and lockdowns which he says are completely unnecessary, he also talks about the inadequacy of the PCR tests used around the world.

“I do want to emphasize that positive tests do not, underlined in neon, mean a clinical infection…It’s simply driving public hysteria, and all testing should stop unless you’re presenting to hospital with some respiratory symptoms

You can read more and listen to the Dr.’s own account here.

Many other experts have also confirmed the same opinion- it is completely meaningless, and contrary to all accepted medical ethics, to test and quarantine healthy people:

The PCR test’s own inventor, Kary Mullis, made it clear that they were not a diagnostic test, and could find anything you wanted. This is because they are magnifying tool, which can magnify the presence of virtually anything billions and even trillions of times until it is detectable. Thousands of viruses are endemic in the human body, which means that , according to the old adage, just as we probably breathe a molecule or two of Napoleon’s breath with each of ours, we all have a molecule or two of something that would show up as a ‘positive” in a PCR test if magnified millions of times.

Nor is it clear that there is a “gold standard” by which to assess the accuracy of the tests, or even if what they are testing for is indeed the corona virus, as this in-depth article explores.

2. The “Casedemic”- 90% of “positive” tests are healthy people, not infections

The scary hockey-stick graphs they show in the TV and MSM showing ever-rising “cases” are not sick or infectious people at all, but just a function of the meaningless testing process. They are presented without context and are largely a function of more testing, which will necessarily generate more total “cases”. It is a simple and obvious case of lying with statistics- if test results were shown as a percentage of tests performed, the graphs would look much less frightening.

But the vast majority of these “cases” are not sick people at all, but simply positive test results. Most people already now this – why else would you need to get a test to know if you are sick?

The diagnosis of illness must start with disease, ie symptoms. Most people who test positive are asymptomatic, they are not sick people, and they are not infectious. Whoever heard of a pandemic where they have to test you to see if you have the disease? Why does it matter if there is a rise in “cases”- they are not cases, they are positive tests? In the old world, pre-Covid, it was uncontroversial that our immune systems protect us, and that to keep healthy we need continual mingling in order to swap viruses and build immunity. We don’t test and then quarantine people for ‘flu viruses or anything else- if we did, we would all be in quarantine on a permanent basis.

Perhaps that is the whole idea.

Data analyst Ivor Cummings explains the problems of the “casedemic” very well in this video:

In March 2020 we changed the rules of quarantine, standing on its head consensus science that had served well for over a hundred years, and began requiring healthy individuals to quarantine for up to two weeks, on the basis of an entirely bogus test. The impact on people’s lives and livelihoods across the world is simply immense. One small victory against this totalitarian regime recently took place in Portugal where a court ruled that it was illegal to impose quarantine on the basis of these tests:

Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.

3. Asymptomatic transmission is not a thing

The entire basis for lockdowns, the entire reason for corona-hysteria is based on a third lie: that anyone could be spreading the virus even without symptoms. You might kill granny, so stay at home, close down your entire life, don’t even go outside unless absolutely necessary.

This has never been true for other corona viruses like the ‘flu- received wisdom was that a cold or ‘flu would be infectious for a few days only with symptoms ie when you are actually sick. The WHO confirmed that asymptomatic transmission is, at worst, “extremely rare”, back in June:

When I posted this on Facebook in the summer, it was censored- even though it was the official information from the WHO! The WHO quickly repudiated this statement, and the chief scientific advisor was forced to claim that, based only on models, it could indeed be a problem.

However, many other scientists who now advocate permanent lockdowns, including Fauci, had previously made it clear that asymptomatic transmission had never been a driver of transmission in previous pandemics:

In all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is ALWAYS a symptomatic person

National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease U.S. Director Dr. Anthony Fauci

This week, a new study published in Nature Communications of tracing from a very large population in Wuhan has confirmed what was previously already known- that asymptomatic transmission is not a thing:


We are being fed a constant diet of false information based on fear-mongering. The data presented is without context, and meaningless. If these three deceptions were widely understood, the population would stop complying with tyrannical lockdown policies and we could all go back to living our lives more or less freely, and make our own decisions about health risks just as we have always done perfectly well before.