Genetic Engineering should be welcomed by the Organics movement

Seems like there is a crack of light opening up in the organic movement with regard to Genetic Engineering, judging by remarks made by Phil Bloomer, director of policy and campaigns at Oxfam, at the Soil Association’s annual conference in London on Friday (March 2):

“From the outside the organic movement seems insular, like it is the only one who has the answers.”

He pointed to the debate around genetically modified (GM) crops as one area where there could be a more open debate by the organic movement.

He added: “I understand the Soil Association’s concerns around GMOs. The fact is, however, there are a lot of GMOs which are necessary.

“Many small farmers do not have 15 years to wait in order to breed into their wheat the soil nutrition efficiency they need. GM can speed up that process.”

This of course is the line taken in the book Tomorrow’s Table by Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchuk- GE is a biological approach and so there is every reason for the organic movement should embrace it, since the whole point of the organics movement was as an alternative to synthetic chemicals in farming in the form of pesticides and fertilizers. The problem is, organic yields are lower than conventional- if yields could be increased through for example disease resistant varieties like the blight resistant spuds I blogged about last week, this could help to make organic crops more viable. GE spuds could dramatically reduce the use of fungicides.

To feed the world’s expanding population, farmers will need every tool available to them to increase yields without destroying soil-Genetic Engineering is one approach that cannot be ignored in its potential to help reduce the impacts of farming. More food from less land- a sort of “sustainable intensification” should be the goal- otherwise we will encroach ever more into wild lands to feed ourselves.

At the end of the day, the criteria for what constitutes “organic” is decided by whoever sits around a table and draws up the list. As technology improves, the organic movement should be willing to adapt its criteria – lest it otherwise sinks back into the Dark Ages and becomes irrelevant.


2 thoughts on “Genetic Engineering should be welcomed by the Organics movement

  1. GMO acceptance and integration with other forms?! I never thought I’d see the day!

    I recently wondered what Organic will do when other forms of agriculture start kicking its ass more and more. They’ve painted themselves into a philosophical corner with irrational restrictions (like banning GMO) where science-based agriculture doesn’t have such limiting factors. I think most people can get on board with the supposed originating underpinnings of Organic but the rules they impose seem to be based on philosophy rather than science. The proof will ultimately be in the pudding and science-based agriculture will have a lot more pudding. That is, unless Organic can start incorporating new technologies such as GE. What new narrative will they have to spin to appeal to their proponents for acceptance?

  2. Very nice. Both transgenic and organic systems are sustainable technologies. If we could look to 2050 and beyond these two will dominate food production. We won’t have a choice. To get more production with less agricultural input and fewer environmental insults, we will need a marriage of these technologies. Great blog, in an unpopular topic that will someday be looked at through a visionary lens.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s